《世界历史》2015年第5期
2015-11-26
目 录
·“重视失败者历史的研究”笔谈·
应重视“失败者历史”的研究 /张顺洪(4)
历史不应只由胜利者来书写和褒贬 /何怀宏(7)
“失败者历史”:一种历史研究和书写的主题取向 /张文涛(10)
撰写“失败者历史”意味着什么 /袁江洋(14)
失败者有自己的历史吗 /张旭鹏(16)
土著真是人类历史上的“失败者”吗 /朱利安·昆尼(19)
·欧洲史·
近代法国政府职能转变与谷物自由市场的建构 /周立红(23)
英国议会圈地投资中的个人权利 /徐滨(35)
19世纪伦敦东区:一个城市的“另类世界” /张卫良(52)
·美洲史·
自然权利观念与19世纪上半叶美国拥奴派的政治话语 /蔡萌(65)
邦联国会争取关税权的努力及其意义 /雷芳(75)
现代化战略与对外关系:波菲里奥·迪亚斯时期墨西哥外交政策 /孙若彦(86)
·古代史·
论古代埃及经济的特征 /金寿福(96)
赫梯基拉姆节日活动的仪式特征及其功能 /刘健(109)
论赫梯王国的流放政策 /蒋家瑜(120)
·学术史·
近代英国首部集体编纂的世界史初探 /张乃和(131)
20世纪80年代以来英美学界的殖民时期非洲史研究述评 /李鹏涛(138)
·学界动态·
美国历史学家组织年会在密苏里州圣路易斯召开 /胡晓进(151)
第七届东方外交史国际学术会议在俄罗斯克拉斯诺亚尔斯克召开 /郝葵(152)
“日本现代化进程中的社会、思想与文化”学术研讨会在成都召开 /许晓光(154)
·书讯·
《孟加拉国政治发展与民族问题研究》(108)
《冷战史研究档案资源导论》(130)
CONTENTS No. 5
The Transformation of Government Functions and the Creation of a Free Grain Market in Modern
France /Zhou Lihong(23)
Individual Rights in the English Parliamentary Enclosures /Xu Bin(35)
East London in the Nineteenth Century:The “Alien World” of a City /Zhang Weiliang(52)
The Notion of Natural Rights and the Political Discourse of Pro-slavery Americans in the First
Half of the Nineteenth Century /Cai Meng(65)
The Tariff Reform of the Confederate States of America and Its Significance /Lei Fang(75)
On the Diplomatic Policy of the Mexican Porfirio Díaz Government /Sun Ruoyan(86)
On the Characteristics of Ancient Egyptian Economy /Jin Shoufu(96)
On the Ritualized Nature of the Hittite KI. LAM Festival /Liu Jian(109)
On the Penalty of Exile in the Hittite Kingdom /Jiang Jiayu(120)
A Preliminary Investigation into the First English Work on World History /Zhang Naihe(131)
A Review of Euro-American Scholars' Studies of the History of Colonial Africa /Li Pengtao(138)
SUMMARIES OF ARTICLES
Zhou Lihong, The Transformation of Government Functions and the Creation of a Free Grain Market
in Modern France
From the 1815 Restoration to the Second Empire, the French government gradually abandoned its
supervision of grain circulation, which greatly contributed to the formation of a free grain
market during the 1860s. This process was not a mere deregulation; instead, it represented a
transformation of government functions. First, the practice of abrupt government intervention
in the grain market was ended, the authority of grain supply distributed to local
administrations and bakers, and the grain prices left to the regulation by tariff or
intermediaries, such as the Caisse. Second, by ceding its power, the government stimulated
agricultural production and railway construction through macro-control, legal protection, and
financial support, laying the foundation for the formation of an integrated national grain
market. It was a turning point in the relationship between market and government in French
history, representing the budding of a “French model” of market-government relationship and
paving the way for a stable network in the regulation of grain production and circulation after
the World War II.
Xu Bin, Individual Rights in the English Parliamentary Enclosures
The English Parliamentary Enclosures mainly occurred in the Midlands during the period of 1750
-1850. In principle, the practice of the English Parliamentary Enclosures was in accordance
with the individual rights and was legalized by ad hoc acts. In particular, land allotment and
benefit compensation were conducted on the basis of the rights of property owners, and the
investment fund of enclosure was also raised and shared in the same fashion. During the process
of enclosure, the rights and interests of property owners and farmers were generally protected.
Meanwhile, the enclosure was a massive agricultural investment, its capital being collected
from savings, land sales, and loans of property owners. After the enclosures, the public rights
of land disappeared, and definitive individual property rights came to be established. As a
result, the transformation of land property system and utilization methods was accomplished in
England, and the efficiency of agricultural resources boosted, providing the basis for
agricultural modernization.
Zhang Weiliang, East London in the Nineteenth Century:The “Alien World” of a City
East London was an integral part of London. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, East
London was denigrated by medical officers, journalists, writers, social critics, moralists, and
preachers as a place of poverty, crowdedness, filth, illness, degradation, crime, and moral
degeneration-literally an “alien world”. As a matter of fact, however, a major industrial
transformation occurred in the mid-18th century in East London, contributing to the prosperity
of navigation and manufacture, while the decline occurred in the mid-19th century, resulting in
a host of social problems. Moreover, land property of manors, public administration, urban
infrastructure, and immigrants exacerbated existing problems. Compared with other metropolitan
districts, East London was not “alien”. There were objective reasons behind this phenomenon.
Cai Meng, The Notion of Natural Rights and the Political Discourse of Pro-slavery Americans in
the First Half of the Nineteenth Century
There was a subtle yet complicated relation between the notion of natural rights and the
political discourse of pro-slavery Americans in the first half of the 19th century. On the one
hand, Natural Rights practitioners advocated egalitarian principles and a rebellious spirit,
which undermined the existence of the southern slavery system. On the other hand, the notion of
Natural Rights became an important ideological bolster of the slavery system as well after
being reinterpreted by pro-slavery Americans. The latter insisted on an irrevocable hierarchy
in the concept of nature, using “scientific research results” to compromise the idea of
universal equality and arguing, instead, for the superiority of the southern slavery system.
Furthermore, pro-slavery Americans made a distinction between “individual people” and
“collective people”, remolding “the right to rebel” into the right of states to rebel
against the union, instead of the right of individuals to rebel against the government. Hence,
the legitimacy of slave rebellion was repudiated, while the states' right was theoretically
approved.
Lei Fang, The Tariff Reform of the Confederate States of America and Its Significance
While the right to levy taxes was necessary for sustaining modern sovereign states, the
Congress of the Confederate States of America was limited by lacking this right. In order to
ameliorate its financial situation, the Confederate Congress initiated a tariff reform. It
aimed at enhancing the power of the Confederate government by granting it the right to collect
tariffs. However, the reform was finally thwarted by resistance. However, despite of the
failure, it represented an early attempt to reform the framework of the Constitution of the
Confederate States of America to win for the national government the right to levy taxes,
especially on importation. Thus, it came to be an important part of the early American state
building process.
Sun Ruoyan, On the Diplomatic Policy of the Mexican Porfirio Díaz Government
The diplomatic policy of the Mexican Porfirio Díaz government (1876-1911)was significant in the
modernization of Mexico. While his policy did not remain unchanged, it was not an
undifferentiated concession of national interests to the great powers as well. Under the
guidance of positivism, Díaz and his fellow “scientists” adopted the policy of inviting
foreign capital during his second term. Unfortunately, his over-reliance on foreign factors led
him into the betrayal of national interests, which incurred the dissatisfaction of people and
the revolution in 1910, resulting in the fall of his regime. Although he strived to find an
equilibrium between the European and American powers, the recession of European influence and
the rise of the American strength dictated that such a balance was unattainable.
Jin Shoufu, On the Characteristics of Ancient Egyptian Economy
In the field of ancient history, publications on the economic problems have gradually and
steadly grown. This is also the case in Egyptology. Some scholars try to explain the ancient
Egyptian economy with modern theories of economics, while others intend to find ancient
Egyptian proofs for modern theories. This article examines ancient Egyptian economy in light of
the theory of “redistribution” put forward by Polany, and comes to the conclusion that
redistribution was not practiced nationwide and thus did not play a decisive role. In the
opinion of those who approve the theory of redistribution, trade played a negligible role in
ancient Egypt. Using written and other materials, the author tries to reveal that the ancient
Egyptians carried out multiple profit-oriented activities, and relevant markets had existed
from the Old Kingdom on and was supervised and protected by the administrative authority. We
have at present limited documents on ancient Egyptian economy, but the author is of the opinion
that ancient Egyptian economy was generally at a primitive stage, with some elements comparable
to modern economy.Liu Jian, On the Ritualized Nature of the Hittite KI. LAM Festival
The rulers of the powerful Hittite Kingdom dominating central and southeastern Anatolia as well
as northern Syria between the 17th-12th centuries BC tried to consolidate their rule in several
ways. Among these were celebrations, ceremonial rites, and festivals, which played an important
role. This article focuses on one of the Hittite major national festivals, i. e. KI. LAM
Festival. Tracing its textual composition and history, this paper aims to reconstruct its
celebration procedures and its ritualized nature in comparison with and contrast to other
contemporaneous national festivals. It concludes that the festival and other national festivals
were utilized by the Hittite rulers to showcase their legitimacy, authority, and power.
Jiang Jiayu, On the Penalty of Exile in the Hittite Kingdom
In the Hittite Kingdom, exile, developed from a punishment of royal members to a national
policy, was an important penalty for political prisoners. Categorically, it falls into three
types:“confinement”, which alleviated the conflict among royal members, serving to strengthen
the power of the kings; “imprisonment”, which ensured the functioning of the administrative
system, balancing the central power with local power; and “banishment”, which served to
maintain the stability of the royal family and the entire society. The exile policy had its
limitations, and its results were often transitory and provisionary, but it was nonetheless
conducive to the consolidation of the kingdom.
Zhang Naihe, A Preliminary Investigation into the First English Work on World History
Published between 1736 and 1766 in London, An Universal History:From the Earliest Account of
Time to the Present, was the first work on world history compiled collectively in modern
Britain. The monumental work was divided into two parts, consisting of 22 and 44 volumes
respectively. It features a nation state orientation, a global perspective, and secularism in
outlook. The book, also referred to as The English Universal History(EUH), did not only have a
great impact on Europe at the time of its publication, but also resulted in profound
reverberations:the proposal, design, compilation, and publication of The Cambridge Ancient
History, The Cambridge Medieval History, and The Cambridge Modern History(initially named as “
Universal History” too)were similar to those of the EUH. As some scholars point out,
notwithstanding a recent return of universal history, this book is still noteworthy.
Li Pengtao, A Review of Euro-American Scholars' Studies of the History of Colonial Africa
Reflecting on the “nationalist historiography” paradigm of the 1960-70s, Euro-American
studies of the colonial Africa from the 1980s onwards have started to reexamine the complex
relationship between colonization and social transition. Relevant studies mainly focus on the
nature and essence of colonial states, the relations between colonial rule and African social
transition, the internal relations between African social transition and decolonization, the
impact of colonial history on African development, etc. The studies indicate that as the social
structure was altered by ethnicity, customary law, indirect rule, and the forced labor system,
the colonization actually caused drastic social changes in Africa. Meanwhile, the social
changes reshaped the perception and policy of the colonists, providing an important background
for the understanding of decolonization.